Page 1 of 3

Chrome 4 vs Firefox 3.6 vs IE8

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:06 am
by snipershady
Test Sunspider

Firefox 3.6 - Total: 569.2ms +/- 0.9%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[24,24,24,24,24],%223d-morph%22:[28,28,27,27,28],%223d-raytrace%22:[35,34,38,35,35],%22access-binary-trees%22:[24,24,23,24,24],%22access-fannkuch%22:[47,45,45,45,45],%22access-nbody%22:[14,13,13,14,14],%22access-nsieve%22:[8,8,8,8,8],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[1,1,1,0,1],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[8,8,8,8,8],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[2,2,2,2,1],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[15,15,15,15,15],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[28,29,29,28,28],%22crypto-aes%22:[18,17,19,17,19],%22crypto-md5%22:[8,7,7,7,7],%22crypto-sha1%22:[5,5,5,4,4],%22date-format-tofte%22:[50,49,49,46,47],%22date-format-xparb%22:[49,48,48,50,48],%22math-cordic%22:[16,16,16,15,16],%22math-partial-sums%22:[9,9,9,9,9],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[3,3,3,3,3],%22regexp-dna%22:[32,33,32,33,33],%22string-base64%22:[7,7,7,6,6],%22string-fasta%22:[33,33,33,32,33],%22string-tagcloud%22:[45,46,47,47,51],%22string-unpack-code%22:[47,48,48,48,49],%22string-validate-input%22:[15,16,15,16,17]}
Chrome - Total: 328.8ms +/- 2.4%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[14,15,18,18,18],%223d-morph%22:[22,17,17,16,17],%223d-raytrace%22:[17,15,15,16,16],%22access-binary-trees%22:[1,2,1,2,1],%22access-fannkuch%22:[11,12,10,11,11],%22access-nbody%22:[12,13,12,10,11],%22access-nsieve%22:[3,3,4,3,3],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[2,2,2,2,3],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[7,7,6,7,6],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[7,7,7,6,6],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[12,10,10,11,10],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[2,2,2,2,2],%22crypto-aes%22:[8,7,7,7,6],%22crypto-md5%22:[6,6,7,6,7],%22crypto-sha1%22:[6,6,7,6,6],%22date-format-tofte%22:[22,19,19,19,20],%22date-format-xparb%22:[22,19,20,20,19],%22math-cordic%22:[12,11,12,11,11],%22math-partial-sums%22:[14,13,14,14,12],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[5,5,5,6,5],%22regexp-dna%22:[11,10,10,10,10],%22string-base64%22:[12,12,13,14,13],%22string-fasta%22:[20,20,19,19,19],%22string-tagcloud%22:[27,28,27,28,28],%22string-unpack-code%22:[41,45,43,41,41],%22string-validate-input%22:[23,21,22,22,21]}
IE8 32bit - Total: 3643.0ms +/- 1.0%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B142,149,141,141,141%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B136,151,136,140,139%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B160,172,162,162,164%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B104,104,105,105,105%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B343,359,345,352,351%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B168,181,171,168,170%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B89,96,87,89,87%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B87,88,88,92,87%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B99,98,97,100,99%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B247,244,262,242,243%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B167,185,172,173,169%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B96,98,97,101,97%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B114,114,120,114,115%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B78,79,78,78,83%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B78,83,80,79,80%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B154,153,154,153,154%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B135,135,139,135,135%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B178,181,178,177,177%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B116,115,116,117,115%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B107,108,108,111,107%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B139,142,142,142,151%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B120,124,128,123,122%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B185,179,182,190,182%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B128,125,122,129,127%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B118,113,112,113,117%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B123,117,116,115,115%5D%7D
Opera 10.50 - Total: 250.8ms +/- 1.1%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B10,9,9,9,9%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B12,12,12,12,12%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B12,12,13,12,12%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B3,3,3,3,3%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B14,15,14,15,15%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B9,8,8,9,8%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B2,2,1,2,1%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B2,2,3,2,2%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B2,1,1,1,1%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B6,6,7,6,6%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B2,2,2,2,3%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B10,9,9,9,10%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B4,3,3,3,3%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B2,2,2,3,2%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B11,11,11,11,11%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B20,19,19,19,20%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B6,6,6,5,6%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B16,16,16,16,15%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B3,3,3,4,4%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B10,10,10,9,10%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B16,16,16,16,18%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B15,14,15,15,14%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B25,25,24,25,24%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B19,19,20,20,19%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B18,18,18,18,18%5D%7D
Chrome 5 - Total: 282.6ms +/- 4.2%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B16,20,17,18,19%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B20,15,15,16,14%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B13,12,12,12,11%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B1,1,1,1,1%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B12,11,11,12,12%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B11,10,10,10,10%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B4,4,4,3,3%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B2,2,2,3,3%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B6,6,7,7,6%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B7,7,8,7,8%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B9,9,9,12,9%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B2,2,2,2,2%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B8,6,7,6,7%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B6,6,6,6,6%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B6,5,5,5,5%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B16,15,14,14,14%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B19,16,17,17,18%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B14,12,11,11,11%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B17,15,15,15,14%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B5,5,5,6,4%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B11,11,11,11,10%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B9,10,9,10,9%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B12,12,13,13,12%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B27,24,24,26,25%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B32,29,28,27,30%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B14,14,13,13,13%5D%7D
sarebbe simpatico vedere i risultati del test fatto su MAC Safari vs Firefox 3.6 (però anche firefox deve esser testato su MAC, perchè cmq la configurazione HW+SW influisce sul test e quindi il MIO riferimento non è assoluto)

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:25 am
by snipershady
ovviamente sul mio notebook da battaglia i risultati sono drasticamente diversi

Chrome 4 - Total: 1376.4ms +/- 3.9%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[152,76,90,91,92],%223d-morph%22:[101,83,90,84,104],%223d-raytrace%22:[67,62,66,62,62],%22access-binary-trees%22:[5,5,8,5,5],%22access-fannkuch%22:[41,53,43,59,41],%22access-nbody%22:[63,57,70,61,60],%22access-nsieve%22:[13,14,15,13,12],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[7,8,8,8,7],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[20,20,19,33,20],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[32,28,31,30,31],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[43,41,45,43,41],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[8,10,6,8,8],%22crypto-aes%22:[27,33,26,29,25],%22crypto-md5%22:[25,26,25,24,26],%22crypto-sha1%22:[27,25,42,25,23],%22date-format-tofte%22:[67,64,69,73,61],%22date-format-xparb%22:[75,71,77,76,69],%22math-cordic%22:[104,105,102,104,105],%22math-partial-sums%22:[57,58,56,58,57],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[30,32,32,32,29],%22regexp-dna%22:[36,36,35,36,34],%22string-base64%22:[51,73,51,48,46],%22string-fasta%22:[70,77,73,70,70],%22string-tagcloud%22:[89,93,91,88,89],%22string-unpack-code%22:[138,130,128,130,130],%22string-validate-input%22:[99,82,77,80,81]}
Firefox 3.6 - Total: 1880.0ms +/- 1.0%

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?{%223d-cube%22:[74,73,72,73,73],%223d-morph%22:[85,103,84,85,85],%223d-raytrace%22:[116,116,113,115,114],%22access-binary-trees%22:[83,81,83,81,82],%22access-fannkuch%22:[135,145,131,132,133],%22access-nbody%22:[47,47,47,48,47],%22access-nsieve%22:[23,22,25,24,23],%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:[3,3,3,3,3],%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:[19,20,19,20,19],%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:[4,4,4,4,4],%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:[47,46,49,64,47],%22controlflow-recursive%22:[90,90,91,90,104],%22crypto-aes%22:[58,58,56,53,58],%22crypto-md5%22:[24,35,23,24,24],%22crypto-sha1%22:[14,14,15,14,15],%22date-format-tofte%22:[142,141,141,140,142],%22date-format-xparb%22:[136,137,136,137,135],%22math-cordic%22:[68,68,68,68,67],%22math-partial-sums%22:[31,30,30,30,31],%22math-spectral-norm%22:[12,12,12,11,12],%22regexp-dna%22:[124,124,124,124,126],%22string-base64%22:[23,23,23,23,22],%22string-fasta%22:[112,113,112,111,112],%22string-tagcloud%22:[186,168,188,173,198],%22string-unpack-code%22:[162,162,162,162,162],%22string-validate-input%22:[55,55,56,59,64]}
Ie 8 neanche lo avvio sul notebook... :asd:

Re:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 11:49 am
by Muchoz
Nosferatu wrote:Possiamo avere una diagnosi capibile da questi dati? Non so leggerli
avevo paura a scriverlo io.....grazie :asd:

Re: Re:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:12 pm
by Coar
Muchoz wrote:
Nosferatu wrote:Possiamo avere una diagnosi capibile da questi dati? Non so leggerli
avevo paura a scriverlo io.....grazie :asd:
:asd:

stessa cosa... se lo facevo avrei avuto di rimando una sequela di insulti :sisi:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:36 pm
by snipershady
Nosferatu wrote:Possiamo avere una diagnosi capibile da questi dati? Non so leggerli
la parte tra le tag CODE dovete copiarla e incollarla nel browser.

E' un LINK, solo che essendo pieno di parentesi e simboli la tag URL non funziona correttamente e quindi... ho usato la tag CODE che non altera il contenuto.

Cmq ho riportato il valore "totale" espresso in MILLISECONDI per ogni test. Quello è leggibile chiaramente.
Sul mio PC con 8Cores chrome impiega 300ms a finire il test, FF 500 e IE --->tendente ad infinito :asd:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 2:36 pm
by Muchoz
IE - Total: 3643.0ms +/- 1.0%

Re: Chrome 4 vs Firefox 3.6 vs IE8

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:29 pm
by Nuvoletta!
Chrome sul mio cadavere dell'ufficio :

Total: 1376.4ms +/- 3.9%

:asd:

Re:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 3:59 pm
by Nuvoletta!
Nosferatu wrote:io sono su mac, e ho safari e ff
come faccio a fare benchmark?
non c'è il copia incolla sul mac? :asd:

Re:

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:07 pm
by Coar
Nosferatu wrote:ricchione, incollare cosa dove come quando, perchè?
:asd:

perchè-> per fare il benchmarck

cosa->i codici messi fra sniper nella barra url del browser, dopodichè fai run again

Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 6:02 pm
by snipershady
Nosferatu wrote:Total: 384.0ms +/- 2.6% con Safari
quindi Chrome sul mio pc resta più veloce!!

Dopo provo safari sul mio pc

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:37 am
by snipershady
Mio PC - SAFARI 4.0.4

Total: 354.8ms +/- 1.2% <--- faccio il culo al MAC.. dove safari è "NATIVO" :asd:

Code: Select all

http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider-results.html?%7B%223d-cube%22:%5B12,12,11,11,11%5D,%223d-morph%22:%5B16,16,17,16,16%5D,%223d-raytrace%22:%5B16,16,17,17,17%5D,%22access-binary-trees%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5%5D,%22access-fannkuch%22:%5B16,17,17,17,16%5D,%22access-nbody%22:%5B11,11,11,10,11%5D,%22access-nsieve%22:%5B7,8,7,7,7%5D,%22bitops-3bit-bits-in-byte%22:%5B4,3,3,3,3%5D,%22bitops-bits-in-byte%22:%5B6,6,7,6,6%5D,%22bitops-bitwise-and%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5%5D,%22bitops-nsieve-bits%22:%5B9,8,9,8,9%5D,%22controlflow-recursive%22:%5B3,2,2,2,3%5D,%22crypto-aes%22:%5B11,11,11,11,11%5D,%22crypto-md5%22:%5B6,5,6,6,6%5D,%22crypto-sha1%22:%5B5,5,5,5,5%5D,%22date-format-tofte%22:%5B21,20,20,19,20%5D,%22date-format-xparb%22:%5B24,24,24,24,25%5D,%22math-cordic%22:%5B12,12,13,12,12%5D,%22math-partial-sums%22:%5B15,16,16,16,16%5D,%22math-spectral-norm%22:%5B4,5,5,5,4%5D,%22regexp-dna%22:%5B16,15,15,14,15%5D,%22string-base64%22:%5B18,18,18,18,18%5D,%22string-fasta%22:%5B28,28,27,28,28%5D,%22string-tagcloud%22:%5B25,26,27,26,26%5D,%22string-unpack-code%22:%5B34,36,36,35,36%5D,%22string-validate-input%22:%5B24,26,25,24,25%5D%7D
snipershady
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; it-IT) AppleWebKit/531.21.8 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Safari/531.21.10

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:59 am
by snipershady
Nosferatu wrote:E' inutile che esalti il tuo sistema operativo inferiore, cercando di infangare la grande macchina mac, perchè sotto il cofano della macchina hai tanti cavalli per farlo andare
scusa i "tuoi cavalli" cosa costerebbero ?

Dall'apple store volendo comprare il tuo MacBook cosa bisognerebbe spendere ?
P.s. vuoi che faccio i test anche con Linux con la stessa macchina ? :asd:

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 4:18 am
by snipershady
Nosferatu wrote:Io questo lo chiamo rosicare forte
veramente... lo dico io :asd:

facciamo il paragone "economico"
dimmi cosa costa quel giocattolo...

Re: Chrome 4 vs Firefox 3.6 vs IE8

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2010 7:05 pm
by Stealth_Fox
Ma questo test... va ad inficiare solamente sul computer o necessita pure di una buona rete?


p.s:

Total: SAFARI 409.0ms +/- 9.1% su un iMac 21,5 pollici 3.06GHz

seconda prova

Total: 392.6ms +/- 0.7%


sul portatile 15 pollici era sui 420 430


p.p.s: il costo di questi giocattoli vale tutto il loro prezzo (in dollari), in €uro un po' meno però vale sempre :D

Per capirlo ogni scettico dovrebbe prendersi un Mac e lavorarci sopra per un po' di tempo. :sisi:

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 12:08 pm
by ice-cris
dico solo che se avessi tanti europei....mi comprerei il MAC ....funziona da DIO.......
poi se diciamo in uso comune di tutti i giorni x giocare,navigare ecc. sicuramente non vale la pena;
ma per quanto riguarda programmi di fotoritocco,progettazione ecc....non ha eguali